Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 19:31:30 +0200: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 09:39:11AM -0500, Hyrum K Wright wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 9:02 AM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> > > wrote: > > > On 09/12/2011 09:12 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > >> [RFC] In new code, rename RESULT_POOL and SCRATCH_POOL to RESULT and > > >> SCRATCH, respectively. > > >> > > >> Because the names are too long and C is strongly typed. > > > > > > Meh. > > > > > > Or, to be more formal about it: -0. > > > > Maybe I'm just getting crotchety in my old age, but I'm also -0 on > > this proposal. > > Me too. Let's keep the names as they are. >
Okay. > Changing this convention would also introduce naming inconsistencies > we'd have to fix up at some point, for no real gain whatsoever. If inconsistencies had been the issue I would have offered to rename the variables throughout the tree.
