On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Hyrum K Wright <hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com> wrote: > All, > I'm currently planning on rolling the final 1.7.0 release candidate > this Thursday evening (UTC +0100). Assuming the tests pass and > signatures are valid, I'll cut the final release from the same magic > revision early next week, with the hope of releasing by weeks' end > (folks won't need to retest if they already tested rc4). > > However, these dates are fluid, and depend on our feeling of > releasability as a community. I'm uncomfortable making that decision > on my own; I know there may be outstanding issues, but don't know > their severity or impact. I therefore request an up-or-down vote of > the above plan. > > Please, no +/-0 votes on this one. I'm asking you to take a stand, > either in favor or against proceeding with the release. I *don't* > want a couple of +1s and a bunch of +/-0's; we need to be sure we have > broad community support behind this much-anticipated release. > > In other words, if you've got an objection, please voice it *NOW*. > (Even if you don't have any objections, it's important to know that, > too.)
I'll do worse than a +/-0, a conditional +1 :-\ I'm +1 if r1173425 and r1173639 are backported, for the reasons described in http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4013#desc3 If these changes are *not* backported then I'm -1 I won't argue with Ivan's suggestion in STATUS (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS?r1=1173538&r2=1173537&pathrev=1173538) that we extend the soak another two weeks, though I want to point out that we are returning to the same API's we used since 1.5, *not* adding anything new. Paul > Thanks, > -Hyrum > > -- > > uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy > http://www.uberSVN.com/ >
