Paul Burba wrote: > You are correct, the doc string had it backwards. I fixed that. [...] > I removed the check and then, since get_most_inclusive_start_rev() and > get_most_inclusive_end_rev() are almost identical, I combined the two > into a new function get_most_inclusive_rev. > > All the above changes were made in r1204617.
Thanks, Paul. That's much clearer. - Julian
