On 11/28/2011 02:19 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > I can see the rationale for not showing it in status (since it can't be > committed), but I suppose there is a reason to show it --- namely, that > if the file has svn:eol-style=LF but the on-disk file has CRLF line > endings, that might break my build and I'd like the tool to tell me > about it. > > I'm leaning to +1 on having 'svn status' _optionally_ report files that > have the wrong eol style on disk.
I would never have assumed that 'svn status' *didn't* report such files. Have we always had such madness as our default behavior?! -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
