Philip Martin <philip.mar...@wandisco.com> writes: > Or suppose I merge a revision that adds X containing X/Y, then I merge > (with a new merge-aware merge) another revision that moves X/Y to X/Z,
Typo: "merge-aware merge" was supposed to be "move-aware" merge. -- uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy http://www.uberSVN.com
