roderich.sch...@googlemail.com wrote on Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 01:33:22 -0800: > Thus a dump consumer can simply store the node records (in one > revision) as a hash (associative array) with Node-path as the key. The > only excption is that it must be prepared to "upgrade" a "delete" to > a "replace" if it encounters an "add" for the same Node-path. Any > other combination of actions on the same Node-path is a malformed > dump.
Is this by design or by accident of implementation? svn_delta_editor_t has no concept of 'replace' and must do delete+add instead, but that does not mean that dumpfiles are allowed to do delete+add too!
