On 01/06/2012 12:10 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> cmpil...@apache.org wrote on Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 16:38:59 -0000:
>> + {"lock", subcommand_lock, {0}, N_
>> + ("usage: svnadmin lock REPOS_PATH PATH USERNAME COMMENT-FILE [TOKEN]\n\n"
>> + "Lock PATH by USERNAME setting comments from COMMENT-FILE.\n"
>> + "If provided, use TOKEN as lock token.\n"),
>> + {svnadmin__bypass_hooks} },
>
> It seems that 'svnadmin rmlocks' removes the locks unconditionally. Is
> there a use-case for 'svnadmin rmlock LOCKED_PATH LOCK_TOKEN'?
>
> (which only rm's the lock if its token is the provided token)Seems like a reasonable thing to offer. -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
