On 20.01.2012 03:23, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > To rule out the common case: are you familiar with Stefan's post giving > a reasons for this?
Nope. > His argument is that 'cd trunk-wc && svn merge ^/branches/feature-branch' > and 'cd 1.7.x-wc && svn merge ^/trunk' are syntactically indistinguishable > but need to execute a semantically different algorithm each. Huh. Why? How are branches, once created, not partial mirrors of each other, with the missing bits noted in mergeinfo? Do you have a link to the post? I'm really intrigued about this assertion. -- Brane
