On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Ivan Zhakov <i...@visualsvn.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 22:05, Bert Huijben <b...@qqmail.nl> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Hyrum K Wright >>> <hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com> wrote: >>> > This mail is very non-committal, but from the looks of CHANGES and >>> > STATUS there are number of items which could potentially make up a >>> > 1.7.3 release. It's been a couple of months since 1.7.2, so it >>> > appears that a 1.7.3 should come sooner rather than later. Perhaps >>> > sometime next week would be reasonable? >>> >>> I have been thinking we are due for a 1.7.3 as well. >>> >>> FWIW, I am travelling next week so cannot test and sign on Windows. >>> If someone else does not step forward to provide the 3rd signature, >>> then worst case I can sign it the following week when I am back. Or >>> you could corral the STATUS file next week and cut the tarball over >>> the weekend or the following week. >> >> I'm also travelling next week, but I'm probably able to provide a signature >> from my hotel. >> That should work, assuming that I don't have hardware and/or network >> problems at home when I'm in the US. >> > I'm also traveling next week and cannot test and provide Windows signatures :)
Seems I'm the exception :-), I'll be quietly at home next week, so I'll be able to provide a Windows sig :-). Apart from that, +1 to roll 1.7.3 as soon as we're able, in the hope that it will reduce the number of problem reports from assertions on the users-list. -- Johan
