On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Bert Huijben <b...@qqmail.nl> wrote: > My scripts build both ways on the buildbots and don't fail, but I don't > see a problem with the fix. > > Bert Huijben (Cell phone) > From: Paul Burba > Sent: 3-2-2012 9:01 > To: Bert Huijben > Cc: Johan Corveleyn; dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r1239695 - in /subversion/branches/1.7.x: ./ > STATUS build.conf contrib/server-side/mod_dontdothat/ > tools/server-side/mod_dontdothat/ > On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Bert Huijben <b...@qqmail.nl> wrote: >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com] >>> Sent: donderdag 2 februari 2012 14:36 >>> To: Stephen Butler >>> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org; rhuij...@apache.org; Stefan Sperling; C. >>> Michael Pilato >>> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1239695 - in /subversion/branches/1.7.x: ./ >> STATUS >>> build.conf contrib/server-side/mod_dontdothat/ tools/server- >>> side/mod_dontdothat/ >> >>> Thanks for confirming. I just proposed r1227900 for backport. >> >> I don't have this problem in my build, but you can add my +1 for >> backporting. > > I also could build mod_dontdothat on 1.7 without r1227900. Bert, > IIRC, like me, you build with static libraries (--disable-shared). I > tried to build with shared libs and the build failed. Johan, I assume > you are building with shared libs? > > P.S. I gave r1227900 the third vote in STATUS. >
Thanks for the votes. Yes, I'm building with shared libs (no --disable-shared). In fact, here is my Makefile in attachment. I've been using this one since the first day I got involved in svn, and it has served me well ... (credits go to danielsh by the way :-), his posting of this Makefile to the users list got the ball rolling for me). Maybe you guys can spot something in there that's different, or somehow related? -- Johan
Makefile
Description: Binary data
