Hyrum K Wright <hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com> writes: > Is there any sense of closure on the serf+windows test failure on the > 1.7.x branch? My sense is that the failure does *not* expose a new > bug on the branch, but rather smokes out an existing one.
That's my view as well. svnrdump has a bug that causes it to rely on the server responding to serf's series HTTP requests in a particular order. It's not a new bug. > If that is > the case, I am not opposed with moving forward on a 1.7.3 release on > the branch as-is, though we'd need to make some kind of note about the > test failure (or quash it for the time being). > > Given the above, I'm inclined to move forward and roll tarballs on > Friday, if nobody objects too loudly. +1 -- uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy http://www.uberSVN.com
