On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Paul Burba <ptbu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 7:47 AM, <phi...@apache.org> wrote: >> Author: philip >> Date: Fri Feb 24 12:47:37 2012 >> New Revision: 1293229 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1293229&view=rev >> Log: >> Fix an "svn log -g" bug that caused occasional missing "Merged via" >> notifications when a revision had changed paths both inside and >> outside the target. This was exposed by the APR hash order changes >> and caused log_tests.py 32 to fail at random. >> >> * subversion/libsvn_repos/log.c >> (send_log): Reduce scope of variable so it is reinitialised on each loop >> iteration. >> >> Modified: >> subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/log.c >> >> Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/log.c >> URL: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/log.c?rev=1293229&r1=1293228&r2=1293229&view=diff >> ============================================================================== >> --- subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/log.c (original) >> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/log.c Fri Feb 24 12:47:37 2012 >> @@ -1152,7 +1152,6 @@ send_log(svn_revnum_t rev, >> && log_target_history_as_mergeinfo >> && apr_hash_count(log_target_history_as_mergeinfo)) >> { >> - svn_boolean_t path_is_in_history = FALSE; >> apr_hash_index_t *hi; >> apr_pool_t *subpool = svn_pool_create(pool); >> >> @@ -1165,6 +1164,7 @@ send_log(svn_revnum_t rev, >> hi; >> hi = apr_hash_next(hi)) >> { >> + svn_boolean_t path_is_in_history = FALSE; >> const char *changed_path = svn__apr_hash_index_key(hi); >> apr_hash_index_t *hi2; >> apr_pool_t *inner_subpool = svn_pool_create(subpool); > > Ah, nice find Philip! I was looking at this last night with less success. +1 on the nice find :)
Has this more impact than just svn log -g? Is this used internally in the merge calculation? Bert