On 02/29/2012 04:23 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 04:07:10PM +0100, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote: >> My impression was that svn tries to leave unversioned data around until the >> user takes care of it (as with 'svn delete dir'). That's what I thought >> obstructed states are for. > > Revert is a bit of a fine line. It is a command that is supposed to > throw away local changes. So by definition is it disruptive and > dangerous. > > However, I agree with the sentiment that revert should not delete > unversioned data from disk.
What stsp said ~Neels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
