Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 07:33:03 +0100: > On 08.03.2012 02:13, Bert Huijben wrote: > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de] > >>Sent: donderdag 8 maart 2012 1:28 > >>To: Stefan Fuhrmann > >>Cc: Subversion Development > >>Subject: Re: Revprop caching 'n stuff > >> > >>On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 11:40:40PM +0100, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > >>>Hi all, > > > >>And this shared mem approach will work with both threaded as well as > >>multi-process servers? > >> > >>If so, this sounds like a good plan to me. > >This still assumes that the repository is only used by a single machine, > >while using NFS paths with multiple servers is not uncommon. (I heard from a > >few of those setups on users@s.a.o) > > That is correct. Those users will not be able to use > revprop caching. And this is one of the reasons why > it will need to be activated explicitly.
Could those users use memcached for the revision proplists?
