On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 18:30, Daniel Shahaf <[email protected]> wrote: > OK, I've had a cruise through now. > > First of all I have to say it's an order of magnitude larger than what > I'd imagined it would be. That makes the "move it elsewhere" idea I'd > had less practical than I'd predicted. I'm also not intending to take > you up on your offer to proxy me to the doc, though thanks for making it. > > Design-wise I'm a bit surprised that the choice ended up being rolling > a custom file format. > > Thanks for your work. > +1. I believe we should implement compressed pristine in simple way: just compress pristine files itself, without inventing some new format.
-- Ivan Zhakov
