On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org> wrote: > On 05.04.2012 17:35, Ashod Nakashian wrote: >>> ________________________________ >>> From: Hyrum K Wright <hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com> >>> >>> I'm glad we've found a way to relegate this problem to a >>> "minor...technicality." >> So far no objections then. >> >> What's the preferred mode of operation in such a case? >> >> I can update the proposal and start sending patches for the dev-list to >> review or I can work in a branch with post-commit reviews. > > I'd like to see this happen on trunk, with the whole compressed-pristine > functionality wrapped in conditional-compilation blocks. > > However, there's likely to be a lot of churn and reviewing all those > patches would never happen in real time. Therefore, I propose you do the > work on a branch, CTR of course. There should be no problem giving you > branch commit access, IMO.
And you can speed up the process by filing a CLA, if you have not already done so: http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.pdf -Hyrum -- uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy http://www.uberSVN.com/
