On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 15:15, Stefan Sperling <s...@elego.de> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 08:07:47PM +0100, Philip Martin wrote: >> Running update also makes mixed-rev source into single-rev so I'd be >> happy not to support mixed-rev move, except that update a single-rev >> tree from one rev to another goes through mixed-rev. > > IMO we don't need to support mixed-rev move at all if it causes > too much pain. If people *really* needed that, they could still > run a mixed-rev-copy+delete. > > Remember that this is a new feature. We can freely add constraints > to it until it gets released.
I thought about that, as I wrote my email. But it isn't a "new feature" from the user's perspective. Subversion 1.7 has no problem with 'svn move' on a mixed-revision working copy. Thus, requiring single-rev would be a regression :-( Cheers, -g
