On 05/17/2012 04:26 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 8:02 PM, C. Michael Pilato <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On 05/17/2012 11:45 AM, Greg Stein wrote: >>> >>> On May 17, 2012 10:27 AM, "C. Michael Pilato" <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>> ... >>>> No, I haven't yet taken a crack at removing the HEAD request. That will >>>> significantly help the fetch-from-pristine-cache situation, but this is a >>>> parallel line of optimization that needs to occur. >>> >>> Yup. Doable; not worried about it. Along with Depth:1 PROPFINDs. I'd like to >>> try the latter before patching. From your test, we see the checkout goes >>> from 1915 down to 203 PROPFINDs. I can make that happen against unpatched >>> servers. >> >> Yup, agreed that would make sense. Those 203 PROPFINDs would be bigger, but >> as I think we've established, the real cost here is in the turnaround, not >> the processing of any one request/response. >> > May be stupid question: why do we need these 203 PROPFINDs for each directory?
It's not 203 PROPFINDs per directory. It's one PROPFIND per directory (at depth:1 ... gets all the props for that directory and its immediate children). -- C. Michael Pilato <[email protected]> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Enterprise Cloud Development
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
