On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:34 AM, Bert Huijben <b...@vmoo.com> wrote: > > Editor v1 only requires the revision for base node replacements and I > don't see why we need to change that for v2. > > If we copied a subtree from a revision we know that that revision > didn't change. How could it be out of date?
The FS does not remember where changes came from, without some deep inspection. If we see "/some/path", then we don't know how it got there. Whether it started there, or whether it was copied there. Now... that said, I just realized that passing the parent revision will not work, because the path will not be found in that target revision. So, yeah: we need to somehow enable passing SVN_INVALID_REVNUM for the children of copies. That is equivalent to the Ev1 behavior: "I'm replacing an uncommitted item". It looks like we can use svn_fs_closest_copy() to determine if a txn node (or an ancestor) has been copied to that target location. Cheers, -g
