Julian Foad <julianf...@btopenworld.com> writes: > Hi Philip. Usually to reproduce a bug we only need to look as far as > the first time something goes wrong. I assume you have a specific > reason in this case for thinking that the information about whether a > *second* sync also fails will be helpful to you, but that may not have > been clear to Kenneth.
I did explain in an earlier email: the problem is svnsync holding open old revision files. I don't know whether these are opened, and left open, during the sync of the revisions leading up to the failed revision or whether they are opened during the sync of the failed revision itself. -- uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy http://www.uberSVN.com
