On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Hyrum K Wright <hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com> wrote: > We've had the "should we remove neon?" discussion before, and the > consensus has felt to resolve in the affirmative. Now is the time for > action. > > I've got a 586 kb patch which removes libsvn_ra_neon from trunk. It > doesn't not remove the --http-library runtime option or config file > code, but does remove the various build stuff which supports building > neon. I obviously haven't tested this on all platforms, and I > wouldn't be surprised if it causes some short-term breakage. My plan > is to commit this patch Real Soon Now, pending any very vocal > objections from folks on this list.
Maybe do it as a number of reviewable pieces, rather than one mother patch? Cheers, -g
