Stefan Sperling wrote on Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 23:27:37 +0200: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:23:38PM +0100, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > From the peanut gallery: as long as svn1.7 errors out, but doesn't > > corrupt any of the data or metadata, perhaps that's something we're > > willing to live with? > > This approach might be suboptimal for GUI apps that use status to > refresh icons etc.
I guess we didn't use a special error code for the "New value in enum" case... (so GUIs can recognize it and treat it as ETHISSVNISTOOOLD)
