On 2012-07-04 13:58:50 +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > I don't understand. It's pretty clear that 1.6 is incorrect, because > it puts a different LCR value in the originating working copy than in > the repository.
Yes, 1.6 is incorrect, but 1.6 might have a regression compared to 1.4 and/or 1.5. Or 1.4 and/or 1.5 were also incorrect and the bug have never really been fixed. 1.7 is also incorrect if you consider the URL (see my reply to Philip Martin). > > The problem now is that the URL + the LastChangedRev together can > > no longer identify the file, because the LastChangedRev can now be > > incorrect as a peg revision. > > I'm afraid I don't follow you here either. Can you give a concrete example? Well, this is more complex that I thought, and 1.7 really has an inconsistency. My example is in my reply to Philip Martin. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
