On 7/8/12 11:48 AM, "Daniel Shahaf" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 15:09:38 +0100:
>> How can we have a 'modify-file' within an added-without-copyfrom tree?
That's a pretty impressive invariant violation. Enversion would have
caught it, but only because we assert that a modify's previous path must
match its current path -- not because we specifically look for this
situation.
I've also never come across this in the wild. We should definitely ping
`rmuir` to find out how he committed that revision; platform, version, etc.
>>Isn't svnsync correct to complain in this case?
Definitely.
>I'd like to resolve the situation on the live svn.a.o repository. I see
>a couple of ways to do so:
>
>- Hand-edit the revision file, changing "modify-file" to "add-file "
>
>- Eliminate r1356317 from history: create an svnsync copy of /repos/asf
> using an authz file that excludes
>/lucene/cms/trunk/content/solr/api-4_0_0_ALPHA
> (or maybe just
>/lucene/cms/trunk/content/solr/api-4_0_0_ALPHA/org/apache/solr/handler/loa
>der/package-summary.html)
> and have the Lucene PMC recreate that tag later
>
>Thoughts?
I'd lean towards a scripted version of option 1. You could then
disseminate the script to svnsync mirror admins (like myself), perhaps via
an ASF/infrastructure blog post?
Trent.
