On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 10:43 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> wrote: > On 08/30/2012 10:45 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:56 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> >> wrote: >>> Theoretically, though, it seems reasonable that my approach would have the >>> distinct non-feature of potentially having the client caching the properties >>> for an entire tree in memory, just waiting for a place to put them. >> >> It should not happen in current ra_serf editor implementation: parsing >> REPORT will be paused when active_fetchs + active_propfinds greater >> than 1000. See REQUEST_COUNT_TO_PAUSE/REQUEST_COUNT_TO_RESUME >> constants in libsvn_ra_serf/update.c > > Excellent! Thanks for pointing that out, Ivan. > I've just tested your change and I want to say that it's really cool: switching between serf trunk and 0.3.x branch is just 5 (five!) requests and 27k of traffic. I think it's my most wanted change in svn 1.8.x :)
-- Ivan Zhakov
