On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:04:24PM -0000, rhuij...@apache.org wrote: > Author: rhuijben > Date: Fri Aug 31 12:04:23 2012 > New Revision: 1379426 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1379426&view=rev > Log: > Remove the new in 1.8, but now unused tree conflict reason > 'moved-away-and-edited'. > > The moved-away status is just a cleaner way of reporting that the > node is deleted and at the same time the root moved. (Which could > also apply to a replaced node). The combination with edited applies > only to a slight subset of the cases and should really be reported > on the to-location of the move. >
Thanks for taking care of this, Bert. I had been planning to remove this conflict reason, too. I introduced it to allow the update editor to label this particular case in a special way. But with the new design of handling this at 'svn resolve' time we don't need this special conflict reason anymore. The resolver can compare file contents at run time to determine whether the file was also edited before or after being moved.
