Julian Foad <julianf...@btopenworld.com> wrote:
>Prabhu Gnana Sundar <prabh...@collab.net> wrote: > >> Julian Foad <julianf...@btopenworld.com> wrote: >>> At the very least there must be agreement on how it's going to exit >and >>> commitment to make it happen. I already asked the question several >>> messages back. Prabhu, please share your thoughts. >> >> Yeah Julian, once an error is encountered, the error message is >notified and the >> exit code is non zero. > >What? Are you talking about an existing version of your patch or >stating your intentions for the future? I am talking about the existing version of my patch. Are you talking about an error >message to be printed at the end (when the command exits), or the error >message per revision? When a verification failure is encountered, the error message is notified for that particular revision and the verification process continues iff --keep-going is true. Finally the command exits with a exit code which is non-zero. -- Prabhu
