On 05.11.2012 12:07, Greg Stein wrote: > This is good stuff. > > In a following commit, you added a package in here... do you actually > intend to modify it? > > I would posit we do not need vendor branches unless we specifically intend > to make local changes.
Yes, I intend to modify it (slightly) so that I can statically embed it into libsvn_subr, similarly to what we do with amalgamated sqlite. (Of course I'm hoping that, eventually, we might be able to get those changes included in the upstream version.) -- Brane > On Nov 5, 2012 5:52 AM, <br...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Author: brane >> Date: Mon Nov 5 10:52:06 2012 >> New Revision: 1405741 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1405741&view=rev >> Log: >> Top-level directory for vendor branches. >> >> Added: >> subversion/upstream/ >> >>
