C-Mike Pilato asks in <http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4239>,
"Julian, what is the exit criteria for this issue's completion? At what point do we call it "finished" -- or at least finished enough that future improvements can be tracked as unique issues?" I guess there are two questions. 1. Do folks feel it's sufficiently operative to be released in its current state, if it should happen that we get around to releasing 1.8 before I do any more work on it, and if no-one else does any more work on it? 2. What exactly should issue #4239 be tracking -- a specific actionable item, or an open list of ideas for improvement (by reference to the wiki page)? Personally, I feel for question (1) "yes, it's just about enough to be worth releasing, although of course I'd like more", and for (2) I'd be inclined to change the issue summary to "enhancements to the mergeinfo summary", change the milestone to "unscheduled", and the priority to "a bit lower". If no-one has other ideas, I'll update the issue accordingly. - Julian
