On 15.11.2012 15:49, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > On 11/15/2012 08:08 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: >> You may have a point there. The next question is, why would anyone want >> to base64-encode a response to a simple GET? Seems like unnecessary work >> for no good reason. > I'm pretty sure we don't base64 our GET responses.
I can't find a codepath that would do that, indeed. Ad-hoc tests seem to imply we don't. The difference in default compression levels between svndiff and mod_deflate could likely be enough to account for the difference in CPU usage. -- Brane -- Branko Čibej Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
