On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 12:36:30AM -0500, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > Here's my suggestion for consideration - let's experiment with this setting > in the beta release process with the setting as-is - that is we always do > the parallel updates unconditionally (except perhaps when svnrdump is being > stupid). If we get real users complaining about the update during that > cycle, we can then figure out either switching the default and/or adding a > config-option or even allowing some control via capabilities exchange. > > Does that sound reasonable? -- justin
Why wait until beta? Can't we get such feedback by asking people to test the nightly releases, or by tagging r1415926 and releasing it as pre-alpha?
