On 01/04/2013 03:57 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Stefan Sperling wrote on Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 19:31:20 +0100: >> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 01:23:28PM -0500, C. Michael Pilato wrote: >>> Can anyone make an argument for me *not* to reintegrate my branch to trunk >>> for 1.8 release? I need to code up some more regression tests for the --cl >>> "" behaviors, but I don't really want to invest that energy today if I know >>> that dev@ is disinterested in seeing this new functionality in 1.8 anyway. >> >> Please merge it to trunk! >> >> This feature is already mentioned in the 1.8 draft release notes and >> I'm glad to learn that you've fixed it up. > > I hope that's not the only reason you want to merge it --- it'd be > simple to axe it from the release notes.
Yeah, I was kinda hoping for a bit more justification myself. Is the trunk behavior what we want to ship/live with? See, I'm having a bit of trouble really remembering the driving use-case here. -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Enterprise Cloud Development
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
