On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Stefan Sperling <s...@apache.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 01:08:04PM +0100, Johan Corveleyn wrote: >> -0 for now, but maybe I don't understand. Are you guys talking about: >> >> 1) 'svn mv wc1/A wc2' will error out, and user will have to figure >> out that he needs to execute 'svn copy; svn delete' >> >> or >> >> 2) 'svn mv wc1/A wc2' will do the same as 1.7 did, under the hood. >> >> ? >> >> >> The difference being that option 1 is a regression for an existing use >> case, and option 2 is actually not a regression (the cross-wc move >> just doesn't get the "move-tracking" enhancement that is new in 1.8). >> > > We're talking about option 2.
Ok, phew :-). Then let's say +0. I'd like it even better if this could be handled correctly with move-tracking, but I can't help in any meaningful way myself with that (and I rather agree that we shouldn't postpone releasing for too long, and keep nice things from our users), so I'll thankfully accept any working solution you guys (anyone) can implement in a reasonable timeframe :-). -- Johan
