On Jan 15, 2013, at 5:29 PM, Ben Reser wrote:

I've opened the issue #4292 on this.
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4292

Thanks.

Note that resolving that problem won't help your particular case
because it'd also mean that D1/D2's creation would be attempted by the
merge and then you'd receive a different tree conflict on that.

Ultimately a fully better user experience with this would require tree
conflict resolution handling.  In this case being able to say "give me
the union of the trees and the union of the properties on the
directories of the trees," would be helpful to you.

Agreed.

--Dave Moon

Reply via email to