On 18.01.2013 11:20, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Ben Reser <b...@reser.org> wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Bert Huijben <b...@qqmail.nl> wrote: >>> I think >>> $ svn mv A B >>> $ svn mv B A >>> >>> Will now store moved_from and moved_to in the same record, at the op-depth >>> of A. >>> (Or copy_tests.py move_file_back_and_forth wouldn't show moved_from and >>> moved_to on a single node using status using the code snippet here) >> This seems really ugly to me: >> $ svn status >> R + A >> > moved to A >> > moved from A > Yeah, pretty ugly ... but perhaps it's not much uglier than the > solution in 1.7 (without move tracking): > > $ svn status > R + A > > Ideally svn should see that this "self-replacement with history" is > perhaps better represented as a simple Modification.
In fact it's not even a modification, the second move just undoes the first one and "svn status" should show nothing at all in this case. -- Brane -- Branko Čibej Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
