On 02/05/2013 06:55 AM, [email protected] wrote: > Author: ivan > Date: Tue Feb 5 11:55:17 2013 > New Revision: 1442555
[...]
> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/reporter.c Tue Feb 5 11:55:17
> 2013
[...]
> + /* Is this delta calculation worth our time? We'll do everything we can
> + to avoid transmitting even an empty text-delta in that case.
> + It doesn't matter if we are ignoring ancestry or not: we're not
> + interested in theoretical differences between "has contents which
> + have not changed with respect to" and "has the same actual contents
> + as" when sending text-delta. */
You've left this comment somewhat crippled. Suggest simplifying:
/* We're not interested in the theoretical difference between "has
contents which have not changed with respect to" and "has the same
actual contents as" when sending text-deltas. If we know the
delta is an empty one, we avoiding sending it in either case. */
--
C. Michael Pilato <[email protected]>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Enterprise Cloud Development
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
