On 22.02.2013 15:34, Philip Martin wrote: > Branko Čibej <br...@wandisco.com> writes: > >> On 22.02.2013 13:32, Philip Martin wrote: >>> The configure option --with-ssl seems to be a remnant of our neon >>> support, it allowed --with-ssl to be passed to an in-tree neon build. >>> I think it can be removed. >>> >>> The --with-gssapi option seems to be related to serf but I don't >>> understand it. It causes the gssapi libraries to be added to the link >>> but why is that necessary? Doesn't serf itself add the libraries it >>> needs? This config option also defines SVN_RA_SERF_HAVE_GSSAPI which >>> seems to be unused. Can we remove --with-gssapi as well? >> Not for builds that link serf statically. > Why not? Isn't serf supposed to tell us which libraries it needs? Why > is gssapi different from any other library?
Ah, I misunderstood this to mean "remove option implies don't link library." Indeed, Serf's pkg-config should DTRT. Sorry for the confusion. -- Brane -- Branko Čibej Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
