On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Ben Reser <b...@reser.org> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Mark Phippard <markp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > FWIW, the Branch Readme does imply he intends to work on some things that > > might have an impact here. >
I pasted the contents of the readme merely to point out that he indicates that he is looking at changes beyond the on-disk storage of the fs, and that those changes "might have an impact here". I was not saying anything else. It might make things better or worse, it might never ever get worked on. Just pointing it out. I think there has been a lot of evidence presented on our lists over the years, that if we had a way to bypass the entire deltification process on large binaries that do not deltify well, it would greatly improve performance in those cases. I think it would be good if that part of the proposal was implemented. -- Thanks Mark Phippard http://markphip.blogspot.com/
