"Bert Huijben" <b...@qqmail.nl> writes: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: MARTIN PHILIP [mailto:codematt...@ntlworld.com] On Behalf Of >> Philip Martin >> Sent: woensdag 13 maart 2013 10:42 >> To: Branko Čibej >> Cc: Mark Phippard; C. Michael Pilato; Philip Martin; >> dev@subversion.apache.org >> Subject: Re: svn_client_move7 and mixed-revisions >> >> Branko Čibej <br...@wandisco.com> writes: >> >> > I have to agree with Mark. As long as we don't know how to track a >> > mixed-revision move in all cases, then it's better to revert to >> > copy+delete than to block the move. Ideally only for those parts of the >> > move source that are actually out of date with regard to the repository, >> > but I take it we haven't got that far yet. >> >> Do we expose this feature in the JavaHL bindings? > > As long as we didn't switch JavaHL to svn_client_move7() we exposed the > option as default via svn_client_move() upto svn_client_move6(). > > But I think Brane switched JavaHL to enable the metadata only move. I would > have to check the commit to see which value he enabled.
I exposed metadata_only but hard-coded allow_mixed_revisions=FALSE. -- Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads: http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download
