On 13.03.2013 14:23, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > Hey, all. The CollabNetters were talking today about the status of our > codebase, and were trying to enumerate the things which are blocking the > 1.8.x branch. > > * Though we've not seen anything explicitly stating as much, we had the > sense (per his toggling of the task's status on roadmap.html to "completed") > that Philip has taken the rename work to a place where he's comfortable > branching. > > * svn_node_kind_t and svn_kind_t -- Brane has been working to eliminate that > bit of confusion (which, as an API matter, certainly counts as a release > blocker).
IMO, that's no longer a blocker, the enums have been merged and only a few implementation quirks remain -- but they're not harmful. > * There's some discussion ongoing about svn_client_move7()'s API flags. > This needs resolution before releasing, too. > > Those are the things we could come up with. Obviously there will be > numerous bug fixes and performance enhancements and such made to the > codebase between now and the release itself. Paul and Julian are debating > something merge-related; Bert commits a minimum of 241 bug fixes per day; > etc. But does anyone know of other release-branch-blocking activities? I would consider "API Review" (and related JavaHL updates) to fall into that category, and it's happening right now. I expect we'll finish that in time to branch next week. -- Brane -- Branko Čibej Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
