On 03/30/2013 02:26 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> r1462828 addresses the issues listed for svn_fs.h and svn_ra_svn.h.
> Please review.

The zero-copy-limit stuff looks good.  I don't quite understand the bit
about svn_fs_verify() possibly ignoring the 'start' and 'end' parameters
altogether.  From code inspection, it certainly *looks* like FSFS will quite
literally walk the reps between start and end, inclusive.  So if you're
simply trying to say that additional revs (outside of the START:END range)
might be checked as a side-effect of verifying the START:END range, then
let's say that.

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Enterprise Cloud Development

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to