On 04/06/2013 03:55 PM, Julian Foad wrote: > Julian Foad wrote: > >> C. Michael Pilato wrote: >>> [...] So I agree, both switch and update should carry the >>> server-recognized meaning of 'ignore-ancestry' in both the client and >>> RA layers. > > In r1465292 I added the 'ignore_ancestry' flag to the RA 'update' APIs, > for consistency with 'switch'. > > That's enough to satisfy my symmetry cravings at the moment.
Sounds good. -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Enterprise Cloud Development
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
