On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:34:12AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > On 04/10/2013 11:23 AM, Julian Foad wrote: > > So shall we get this branch branched very soon? For the sake of making a > > decision, I'll suggest that we should try hard to get the things above > > resolved by the end of tomorrow, and that even if we don't they are not > > blockers, so: > > > > Let's branch on Friday. > > > > Any support or objections? > > None. In fact, thanks to your email, I had to discard my own draft mail > which said similar things but suggested we branch on Monday. :-) > > (Paul, Bert: If you're watching for that mail from me, it won't get sent > now -- we can discuss and +1 on this thread just as easily.) > > +1 to a Friday branch unless folks raise reasonable objections.
Right now, trunk has APIs backing an 'svnadmin info' (or 'svnlook info') command but not a UI for them. (Some of them have unit tests.) I think we don't want to release with just the half-backed APIs, so we'll have to either revert them or add a UI for them. As far as I'm concerned reverting is fine, and I can continue the work on trunk and propose for backport before, say, beta1. This concerns svn_fs_info_* and svn_repos_info_*.
