I was optimising for readability, not portability.

On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 07:46:14AM -0700, Ben Reser wrote:
> I tend to think the absolute URL syntax is better for our
> documentation since the only way the relative URL works is if you run
> it while your CWD is in a working copy in that repo.
> 
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:32 AM,  <danie...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Author: danielsh
> > Date: Fri Apr 12 13:32:31 2013
> > New Revision: 1467266
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1467266
> > Log:
> > * docs/community-guide/releasing.part.html
> >   (#release-branches): Use the short URL syntax.
> >
> > Modified:
> >     subversion/site/publish/docs/community-guide/releasing.part.html
> >
> > Modified: subversion/site/publish/docs/community-guide/releasing.part.html
> > URL: 
> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/site/publish/docs/community-guide/releasing.part.html?rev=1467266&r1=1467265&r2=1467266&view=diff
> > ==============================================================================
> > --- subversion/site/publish/docs/community-guide/releasing.part.html 
> > (original)
> > +++ subversion/site/publish/docs/community-guide/releasing.part.html Fri 
> > Apr 12 13:32:31 2013
> > @@ -1126,8 +1126,8 @@ A.B with the version you're preparing, e
> >  <ul>
> >  <li><p>Create the new release branch with a server-side copy:</p>
> >      <pre>
> > -      svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk \
> > -             https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/A.B.x \
> > +      svn cp ^/subversion/trunk \
> > +             ^/subversion/branches/A.B.x \
> >               -m "Create A.B.x release branch."
> >      </pre></li>
> >
> >

Reply via email to