I was optimising for readability, not portability.
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 07:46:14AM -0700, Ben Reser wrote: > I tend to think the absolute URL syntax is better for our > documentation since the only way the relative URL works is if you run > it while your CWD is in a working copy in that repo. > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:32 AM, <danie...@apache.org> wrote: > > Author: danielsh > > Date: Fri Apr 12 13:32:31 2013 > > New Revision: 1467266 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1467266 > > Log: > > * docs/community-guide/releasing.part.html > > (#release-branches): Use the short URL syntax. > > > > Modified: > > subversion/site/publish/docs/community-guide/releasing.part.html > > > > Modified: subversion/site/publish/docs/community-guide/releasing.part.html > > URL: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/site/publish/docs/community-guide/releasing.part.html?rev=1467266&r1=1467265&r2=1467266&view=diff > > ============================================================================== > > --- subversion/site/publish/docs/community-guide/releasing.part.html > > (original) > > +++ subversion/site/publish/docs/community-guide/releasing.part.html Fri > > Apr 12 13:32:31 2013 > > @@ -1126,8 +1126,8 @@ A.B with the version you're preparing, e > > <ul> > > <li><p>Create the new release branch with a server-side copy:</p> > > <pre> > > - svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk \ > > - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/A.B.x \ > > + svn cp ^/subversion/trunk \ > > + ^/subversion/branches/A.B.x \ > > -m "Create A.B.x release branch." > > </pre></li> > > > >