On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Philip Martin <philip.mar...@wandisco.com> wrote: > That's just repeating what Mattias said. What I want to clarify is why > we want to use a double printf rather than having a new string.
The existing translation key doesn't have a newline on it. Most of the uses it is inappropriate to just add a new line to, since most of them are going into svn_error_t. The alternative to what he's doing is to add a second translation key that has a newline, which creates extra busy work for translators. Another alternative would be to do another svn_cmdline_print of just "\n". Perhaps that's less messy, but I don't have particularly strong opinions on this.
