Should backport.pl attempt to catch such a situation? I'm inclined to say "No", since the entry should not have been moved below the "Approved" header and given three +1 votes if it had a revnum typo. (But it should be easy to inject an 'svn log -qvr | wc -l > 4' type check, if people prefer that.)
Philip Martin wrote on Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 09:02:14 +0100: > Blair Zajac <bl...@orcaware.com> writes: > > > It looks like the wrong revision number was given in STATUS, as it's a > > tomcat commit: > > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=r1471029 > > r1471028 is the revision that should have been proposed/voted/merged. > > -- > Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads: > http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download
