> -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:danie...@elego.de] > Sent: donderdag 13 juni 2013 10:36 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Kidney blame's behaviour and edge cases >
> Another issue: what should 'blame -r 3:3' do? Currently it is allowed, > and prints '-' for lines added before r3 and '3' for lines added in r3. > I am not sure whether that is intentional / by design, or just an > accident of the fact that whoever added the 'end_rev < start_rev' check > should have used the broader condition 'end_rev <= start_rev' instead. > (See r7438 <-> http://svn.apache.org/r847512). > > It seems to me it should ideally print '3' for every line, and the user > should pass '-r 2:3' if he wants to distinguish "added in r3" from > "added before r3". It would be easy to preserve the current behaviour, > though, of printing '-' rather than '2' (where '2' here is the youngest > change to that line, for lines added before r3). I would call this intentional, and would really like to keep this behavior. I certainly don't call it a bug, as this is what makes it possible to know that you need a larger range for blaming to obtain more info. Bert
