Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> Bert Huijben wrote:
>> [email protected] wrote:
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1496434
>>> Log:
>>> * subversion/svn/svn.c
>>> (svn_cl__check_cancel): Validate passed cancel baton for better test
>>> coverage.
>>> Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/svn/svn.c
>>> @@ -1651,6 +1651,8 @@ signal_handler(int signum)
>>> svn_error_t *
>>> svn_cl__check_cancel(void *baton)
>>> {
>>> + /* Cancel baton should be always NULL in command line client. */
>>> + SVN_ERR_ASSERT(baton == NULL);
>>> if (cancelled)
>>> return svn_error_create(SVN_ERR_CANCELLED, NULL, _("Caught signal"));
>>> else
>>
>> Nice fix.
>> I was thinking about adding this last weekend when I noticed the problem
>> on [email protected].
The code looks good but I don't understand the log message. We don't normally
describe input validation as adding better "test coverage". Did you have
something more specific in mind? What problem on dev@ is this related to?
- Julian
