On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 09:15:59PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 25.06.2013 20:45, Greg Stein wrote: > > To that end, I find r1496470 to be insufficient. We need the dynamic > > stuff, and we need to fix the configuration option name. I'm happy to > > work on these two pieces, if we have a bit of consensus. > > We (that is, you and I) certainly do. Is that a quorum? :)
I'd also prefer dynamic detection, and no config knob at all if possible.
