On 07/03/2013 05:07 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
[email protected] wrote on Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 10:49:02 -0000:
+ notify_failure->warning_str = apr_psprintf(pool,
+ _("E%06d: %s"),
Would it make sense to push the E%06d: part down to the implementation
of svn_err_best_message()?
I.e., if the information is useful for this caller, presumably it'll be
useful for others too?
+1
It would always be useful for other callers too because it makes more
sense to show the apr_err when it comes to best message.
--Prabhu
